diff --git a/HarmfulCommunications201908.org b/HarmfulCommunications201908.org
index bdff420..b2b1df9 100644
--- a/HarmfulCommunications201908.org
+++ b/HarmfulCommunications201908.org
@@ -601,7 +601,7 @@
   consider the practice, I would like to take the opportunity to
   briefly raise some additional concerns
 
-** CONSTODO Abuse
+** CONSDONE Abuse
 
    To date, all systems that seek to protect others from harmful or
    other objectionable material (e.g. copyright infringement,
@@ -662,12 +662,18 @@
    providers should protect fundamental rights for expression and
    information. In a regime where sending an e-mail costs nearly
    nothing, where a service risks serious penalties (up to and
-   including having to shutdown) and where a claimant suffers nothing
+   including having to shut down) and where a claimant suffers nothing
    for abusive claims, the regime is guaranteed to be abused.
 
 ** CONSTODO Behaviour
 
+   Much of the focus on legislative efforts to deal with harmful or
+   objectional material on services that permit uploads from users is
+   on what the service providers do about it. Many argue that they are
+   not doing anything, or at least not enough.
+
 ** CONSTODO Content moderation
+** CONSTODO Investigation support 
 * CONSTODO Answers to consultation questions
   The follows are some answers to the questions posed in the call for
   submissions.