From 0929c13a919bf6d394e8a22a9d881c9028c9588c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?=C3=89ibhear=20=C3=93=20hAnluain?= Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:55:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Update --- HarmfulCommunications201908.org | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/HarmfulCommunications201908.org b/HarmfulCommunications201908.org index bdff420..b2b1df9 100644 --- a/HarmfulCommunications201908.org +++ b/HarmfulCommunications201908.org @@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ consider the practice, I would like to take the opportunity to briefly raise some additional concerns -** CONSTODO Abuse +** CONSDONE Abuse To date, all systems that seek to protect others from harmful or other objectionable material (e.g. copyright infringement, @@ -662,12 +662,18 @@ providers should protect fundamental rights for expression and information. In a regime where sending an e-mail costs nearly nothing, where a service risks serious penalties (up to and - including having to shutdown) and where a claimant suffers nothing + including having to shut down) and where a claimant suffers nothing for abusive claims, the regime is guaranteed to be abused. ** CONSTODO Behaviour + Much of the focus on legislative efforts to deal with harmful or + objectional material on services that permit uploads from users is + on what the service providers do about it. Many argue that they are + not doing anything, or at least not enough. + ** CONSTODO Content moderation +** CONSTODO Investigation support * CONSTODO Answers to consultation questions The follows are some answers to the questions posed in the call for submissions.